http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359 Your source for guns rights news and opinion. Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:46:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-16155 Larry L. Stuler Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:43:48 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-16155 This concerns the UN proposed gun ban treaty. The federal gov't is operating under the foreign commerce clause when working with the United Nations. How can this matter to Americans? Here's how we got into this situation. The Declaration of Independence is the organic law of the land and its main tenet is that "all men are created equal". Under such a tenet no person or group of people, including some group called government, may ever initiate force or fraud against any other person or group of people. The Constitution was adopted to form a gov't that would uphold this tenet. The Constitution acknowledges this where in Article I, section 8 it grants the federal government jurisdiction over foreign commerce, interstate commerce, and trade with the Indians. The federal government has no jurisdiction over intrastate commerce since the law is based upon the tenet that "all men are created equal". The individual American is sovereign, not the federal gov’t. See the following Supreme Court decisions that uphold the sovereignty of the individual - United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, Hale v. Henkle, 201 U.S. 43, Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421, Chisholm v. Georgia, 1 L.Ed. (2 Dall.) 415. All of these Supreme Court decisions were rendered before the bankruptcy of the federal gov’t in the 1930’s. Cites from each of these cases can be found at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3g on my Blog. The FED bankrupted the gov't in the 1930's. This is easily evidenced by the correlation between the United States Code (USC) and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): title 11 USC, "Bankruptcy", is implemented by title 11 CFR, "Federal Elections". Our vote is simply to elect a bankruptcy "administration". However, bankrupting the federal gov't wasn't enough to make Americans pay the interest on the FED's counterfeit money loans to the gov't. Sovereignty lies with the individual American, not the federal gov't. as evidenced above by the Supreme Court. To get around all of the chains that the Constitution imposes on the federal gov't, Social Security was created to destroy American sovereignty. The "Form SS-5" that an applicant uses to apply for a S.S.# is actually a federal employment form. After all, only a federal employee is liable for federal employment taxes. You know the name of the federal employee - the "taxpayer". "Taxpayer" is a legal term defined at 26 CFR 2.1-1(a)(5) as a member of the Merchant Marine - a federal employee. 26 CFR 2.1-1(b) states that this is the definition of the term as used throughout the Code and the regulations for all calculation of taxes. The gov’t has been given jurisdiction over its possessions by Article IV, section 3 of the Constitution. By checking the box "U.S. citizen" on the "Form SS-5" the applicant has given the gov't prima facie evidence that he has U.S. possession citizenship. "U.S. citizen" is also a legal term exemplified at 26 CFR 25.2501-1(c) as a person born in one of the States who then establishes a residence in a U.S. possession (Puerto Rico is cited in the example) and, further, acquires U.S. possession citizenship. This regulation then references back to 26 USC sec. 2501(b) where it states that this is the definition of the term "citizen" "wherever used in the title". The U.S. possessions are treated as foreign countries (see 26 USC sec. 865(i)(3), 872(b)(7), and 2014(g) for example). This makes a “U.S. citizen” a foreigner in relation to America. This is the 14th Amendment citizen. The combination of the legal terms "taxpayer" and "U.S. citizen" is known as the "U.S. resident" at 26 USC sec. 865(g). A "U.S. resident" is a "U.S citizen" living in America - a foreigner. So by applying for a S.S.# an American has given away all sovereignty and become a slave to the federal gov't. All of this evidences that the owners of the gov't are quite aware of its limited jurisdiction, but they have absolutely no regard for freedom. The federal gov't is legislating today on two main premises - under foreign commerce and that everyone is a federal employee. The CFR was created during the bankruptcy proceedings in the mid-1930’s to evidence the correlation of which of the new federal regulatory agencies would be in charge of implementing the regulations under the statutes of the USC. Obviously, federal gov’t regulatory agencies can have no jurisdiction over a sovereign American since “all men are created equal” and the federal gov’t has no jurisdiction over intrastate commerce. A sovereign American cannot be denied any rights. But a “U.S. resident” has no constitutional protections. Since one becomes a “taxpayer” by applying for a S.S.#, that person is now subject to the income tax. The income tax was ruled to be constitutional in several U.S. Supreme Court decisions - see Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), Stanton v. Baltic Mining, 240 US 103 (1916), Peck & Co. v. Lowe, 247 US 165 (1918), Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920). These Supreme Court decisions all stated that the gov’t always had the power to tax income and, further, that no new power of taxation was granted to the federal gov’t by the 16th Amendment. In other words, the income being taxed must be within the limited jurisdiction of the federal gov’t to begin with since no new power was granted to the federal gov’t. Cites from each of these cases can be found at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3a on my Blog. Internal revenue is within the customs. Customs gains revenue for the gov't from importing duties from foreign countries. Internal revenue gains revenue for the gov't from importing duties from the U.S. possessions - thus a source of "internal revenue". Customs is foreign commerce. The 3 commerce jurisdictions are cited separately in title 28 USC, "Judiciary and Judicial Procedure", chapter 85, "District Courts; Jurisdiction". Section 1336, "Surface Board Transportation Orders", which was renamed from "Interstate Commerce Commission's Orders" in late 1995, is the interstate commerce jurisdiction. Section 1362, "Indian Tribes", is obviously the trade with the Indians commerce jurisdiction. Section 1340, "Internal revenue; customs duties", is the foreign commerce jurisdiction. Income tax is the second plank of the Communist Manifesto. Inheritance tax is the third plank of the Communist Manifesto. These communistic taxes are only available to the federal gov’t under foreign commerce along with the presumption that the individual is a federal employee. Social Security is the basis of all of America's problems. A sovereign American is just that - sovereign, not subject to any other person. But a "U.S. resident" is subject to every federal regulatory agency in the United States as a foreigner, including the Socialistic United Nations. No treaty with the UN or any other country can impact an American's sovereignty or an American's rights. Go to LLSTULER.wordpress.com to see the entire Social Security Scam. This concerns the UN proposed gun ban treaty.
The federal gov’t is operating under the foreign commerce clause when working with the United Nations. How can this matter to Americans? Here’s how we got into this situation.
The Declaration of Independence is the organic law of the land and its main tenet is that “all men are created equal”. Under such a tenet no person or group of people, including some group called government, may ever initiate force or fraud against any other person or group of people. The Constitution was adopted to form a gov’t that would uphold this tenet.
The Constitution acknowledges this where in Article I, section 8 it grants the federal government jurisdiction over foreign commerce, interstate commerce, and trade with the Indians. The federal government has no jurisdiction over intrastate commerce since the law is based upon the tenet that “all men are created equal”. The individual American is sovereign, not the federal gov’t. See the following Supreme Court decisions that uphold the sovereignty of the individual – United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, Hale v. Henkle, 201 U.S. 43, Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421, Chisholm v. Georgia, 1 L.Ed. (2 Dall.) 415. All of these Supreme Court decisions were rendered before the bankruptcy of the federal gov’t in the 1930’s. Cites from each of these cases can be found at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3g on my Blog.
The FED bankrupted the gov’t in the 1930′s. This is easily evidenced by the correlation between the United States Code (USC) and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): title 11 USC, “Bankruptcy”, is implemented by title 11 CFR, “Federal Elections”. Our vote is simply to elect a bankruptcy “administration”.
However, bankrupting the federal gov’t wasn’t enough to make Americans pay the interest on the FED’s counterfeit money loans to the gov’t. Sovereignty lies with the individual American, not the federal gov’t. as evidenced above by the Supreme Court.
To get around all of the chains that the Constitution imposes on the federal gov’t, Social Security was created to destroy American sovereignty. The “Form SS-5″ that an applicant uses to apply for a S.S.# is actually a federal employment form. After all, only a federal employee is liable for federal employment taxes. You know the name of the federal employee – the “taxpayer”. “Taxpayer” is a legal term defined at 26 CFR 2.1-1(a)(5) as a member of the Merchant Marine – a federal employee. 26 CFR 2.1-1(b) states that this is the definition of the term as used throughout the Code and the regulations for all calculation of taxes.
The gov’t has been given jurisdiction over its possessions by Article IV, section 3 of the Constitution. By checking the box “U.S. citizen” on the “Form SS-5″ the applicant has given the gov’t prima facie evidence that he has U.S. possession citizenship. “U.S. citizen” is also a legal term exemplified at 26 CFR 25.2501-1(c) as a person born in one of the States who then establishes a residence in a U.S. possession (Puerto Rico is cited in the example) and, further, acquires U.S. possession citizenship. This regulation then references back to 26 USC sec. 2501(b) where it states that this is the definition of the term “citizen” “wherever used in the title”. The U.S. possessions are treated as foreign countries (see 26 USC sec. 865(i)(3), 872(b)(7), and 2014(g) for example). This makes a “U.S. citizen” a foreigner in relation to America. This is the 14th Amendment citizen.
The combination of the legal terms “taxpayer” and “U.S. citizen” is known as the “U.S. resident” at 26 USC sec. 865(g). A “U.S. resident” is a “U.S citizen” living in America – a foreigner.
So by applying for a S.S.# an American has given away all sovereignty and become a slave to the federal gov’t.
All of this evidences that the owners of the gov’t are quite aware of its limited jurisdiction, but they have absolutely no regard for freedom.
The federal gov’t is legislating today on two main premises – under foreign commerce and that everyone is a federal employee.
The CFR was created during the bankruptcy proceedings in the mid-1930’s to evidence the correlation of which of the new federal regulatory agencies would be in charge of implementing the regulations under the statutes of the USC.
Obviously, federal gov’t regulatory agencies can have no jurisdiction over a sovereign American since “all men are created equal” and the federal gov’t has no jurisdiction over intrastate commerce. A sovereign American cannot be denied any rights. But a “U.S. resident” has no constitutional protections.
Since one becomes a “taxpayer” by applying for a S.S.#, that person is now subject to the income tax.
The income tax was ruled to be constitutional in several U.S. Supreme Court decisions – see Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), Stanton v. Baltic Mining, 240 US 103 (1916), Peck & Co. v. Lowe, 247 US 165 (1918), Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920). These Supreme Court decisions all stated that the gov’t always had the power to tax income and, further, that no new power of taxation was granted to the federal gov’t by the 16th Amendment. In other words, the income being taxed must be within the limited jurisdiction of the federal gov’t to begin with since no new power was granted to the federal gov’t. Cites from each of these cases can be found at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3a on my Blog.
Internal revenue is within the customs. Customs gains revenue for the gov’t from importing duties from foreign countries. Internal revenue gains revenue for the gov’t from importing duties from the U.S. possessions – thus a source of “internal revenue”. Customs is foreign commerce.
The 3 commerce jurisdictions are cited separately in title 28 USC, “Judiciary and Judicial Procedure”, chapter 85, “District Courts; Jurisdiction”. Section 1336, “Surface Board Transportation Orders”, which was renamed from “Interstate Commerce Commission’s Orders” in late 1995, is the interstate commerce jurisdiction. Section 1362, “Indian Tribes”, is obviously the trade with the Indians commerce jurisdiction. Section 1340, “Internal revenue; customs duties”, is the foreign commerce jurisdiction. Income tax is the second plank of the Communist Manifesto. Inheritance tax is the third plank of the Communist Manifesto. These communistic taxes are only available to the federal gov’t under foreign commerce along with the presumption that the individual is a federal employee.
Social Security is the basis of all of America’s problems. A sovereign American is just that – sovereign, not subject to any other person. But a “U.S. resident” is subject to every federal regulatory agency in the United States as a foreigner, including the Socialistic United Nations. No treaty with the UN or any other country can impact an American’s sovereignty or an American’s rights.
Go to LLSTULER.wordpress.com to see the entire Social Security Scam.

]]> http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-16110 Hillary Clinton and the International Gun Ban - Politics & Current Affairs Forum Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:39:40 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-16110 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-16043 Scott Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:49:22 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-16043 Glad there are still some red blooded AMERICANS left in country! Glad there are still some red blooded AMERICANS left in country!

]]> http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-16016 grumpy Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:57:30 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-16016 be prepared vote this lberals out before the second civilwar begans. these librels are a direct threat to freedom loving americans. i will die protecting my right to bear arms be prepared vote this lberals out before the second civilwar begans. these librels are a direct threat to freedom loving americans. i will die protecting my right to bear arms

]]> http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-16003 Jason Mon, 09 Aug 2010 21:03:10 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-16003 I will fight to the death before they take my guns. The government has seem to be forgeting for the people by the people. We has a nation banning together with one voice can say no. If the government does not hear us then we has united states of america will have to over turn the the ones takeing our rights away. Did they defend us from 911 no the bastards let it happen. Did they do anything for us except spend all our money no. I am not looking for the government to protect me. I will protect me. There was a old man last week got his home broke into. He had a gun and had to shoot one of the thugs in his house as they were trying to charge him. It saved his life. It was a hand gun. Clinton safer in the high livin areas you live in. If you dont like our gun laws then leave the Us go to some where to some other country to take there guns away. We dont want it dont need it lady liberty has had to many people like this to try and take her from us and till death do us part GOD BLESS AMERICA MY HOME SWEET HOME I will fight to the death before they take my guns. The government has seem to be forgeting for the people by the people. We has a nation banning together with one voice can say no. If the government does not hear us then we has united states of america will have to over turn the the ones takeing our rights away. Did they defend us from 911 no the bastards let it happen. Did they do anything for us except spend all our money no. I am not looking for the government to protect me. I will protect me. There was a old man last week got his home broke into. He had a gun and had to shoot one of the thugs in his house as they were trying to charge him. It saved his life. It was a hand gun. Clinton safer in the high livin areas you live in. If you dont like our gun laws then leave the Us go to some where to some other country to take there guns away. We dont want it dont need it lady liberty has had to many people like this to try and take her from us and till death do us part GOD BLESS AMERICA MY HOME SWEET HOME

]]> http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-15919 Scott Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:28:04 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-15919 They want my guns,they'll get them business end first!!!I don't care who it is!Our Second Amendment is in place to help us keep our government from doing this and over stepping their bounderies.It allows us to completely overthrow their worthless hides,by force of arms if need be.It's time to change our government and get these pond scum out of office.IT'S TIME TO TAKE A STAND ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!They had a stroke when Arizona tried passisng their immigration law,and started screaming it was unconstitutional,yet here they are trying to deconstruct a portion of our Costitution in order to fit in with his\her personal agenda.These dodo's in power need to get a clue and give it up.Obama and his lackeys need to get a life and leave America alone,then maybe we can get back on track and work on the real issues when their gone!!!! They want my guns,they’ll get them business end first!!!I don’t care who it is!Our Second Amendment is in place to help us keep our government from doing this and over stepping their bounderies.It allows us to completely overthrow their worthless hides,by force of arms if need be.It’s time to change our government and get these pond scum out of office.IT’S TIME TO TAKE A STAND ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!They had a stroke when Arizona tried passisng their immigration law,and started screaming it was unconstitutional,yet here they are trying to deconstruct a portion of our Costitution in order to fit in with his\her personal agenda.These dodo’s in power need to get a clue and give it up.Obama and his lackeys need to get a life and leave America alone,then maybe we can get back on track and work on the real issues when their gone!!!!

]]> http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-15881 rado Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:30:47 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-15881 They better start building alot of jails They better start building alot of jails

]]> http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-15880 rado Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:30:20 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-15880 Welcome to the Unitrd States of UN. Now they can overide the US constitution. Welcome to the Unitrd States of UN. Now they can overide the US constitution.

]]> http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-15825 Robert Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:38:15 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-15825 Welcome to the Unitrd States of UN. Now they can overide the US constitution. Welcome to the Unitrd States of UN. Now they can overide the US constitution.

]]> http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359&cpage=7#comment-15763 Mark Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:50:51 +0000 http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#comment-15763 They better start building alot of jails And cemetaries. IT WILL PUT TRUE AMERICANS AT WAR. They better start building alot of jails
And cemetaries. IT WILL PUT TRUE AMERICANS AT WAR.

]]>