U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban

The United Nations and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are moving forward with their plan to confiscate your guns.

The United States joined 152 other countries in support of the Arms Trade Treaty Resolution, which establishes the dates for the 2012 UN conference intended to attack American sovereignty by stripping Americans of the right to keep and bear arms.

Working groups of anti-gun countries will begin scripting language for the conference this year, creating a blueprint for other countries when they meet at the full conference.

The stakes couldn’t be higher.

Former United Nation’s ambassador John Bolton has cautioned gun owners about the Arms Trade Treaty and says the UN “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there’s no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

Establishing the dates for the Arms Trade Treaty Conference is just the first step toward their plans for total gun confiscation.

The worldwide gun control mob will ensure the passage of an egregious, anti-gun treaty…

. . .and that’s where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton steps in.

Once the UN Gun Ban is passed by the General Assembly of the United Nations it must be ratified by each nation, including the United States.

As an arch enemy of gun owners, Clinton has pledged to push the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty. She will push for passage of this outrageous treaty designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.

That’s why it’s vital you sign the special petition I’ve made up for your signature that DEMANDS your U.S. Senators vote AGAINST ratification of the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty.”

So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.

But looking at previous versions of the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.

Don’t let any of the “experts” lull you to sleep by saying “Oh, we have it handled” or “Until you know exactly what’s in the treaty you can’t fight against it.”

Judging by Ambassador Bolton’s comments — who certainly knows what to expect from the American-freedom-hating international crowd that infests the U.N. — we are certain the treaty’s going to address the private ownership of firearms.

If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate (which is where we must ultimately make our stand), the UN “Small Arms Treaty” would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:

*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION. So please click here to sign the petition to your U.S. Senators before it’s too late!

You see, this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.

Here’s what you can do to help the National Association for Gun Rights fight Hillary Clinton and her United Nations cronies:

Click here and sign our petition to DEMAND that your United States Senators vote AGAINST the United Nations Small Arms Treaty.

• Forward this petition to your friends and relatives who share your concern for American sovereignty and protecting our right to keep and bear arms.

Please consider making a generous contribution to the National Association for Gun Rights to help us fight Hillary Clinton and the United Nations “Small Arms Treaty.”

324 comments to U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban

  • Laura Warburton

    I am a freedom loving citizen. This report bothers me. When I forwarded your petition, I received a reply to read this 2006 UN document stating they have not entered into such an agreement. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sgsm10537.doc.htm
    I understand 2006 is a long time ago. Can you please give references for your article? Documentation is highly important.

    Thanks,

    Laura

  • mr buick

    What the heck is this world coming too? Its incredible how fast they are trying to take away our guns and freedoms……..

  • C. L. Marlowe

    I feel if this threat is REAL,
    then Hillary Clinton and the ENTIRE Obama Administration should be tried for TREASON.

    The reason being,
    They are attempting to end the 2nd amendment via UN Resolution.

    C. L. Marlowe

  • Jeff McDonald

    Good luck getting 67 votes in the Senate to ratify this anti-American treaty.

  • John Caudle

    I cannot believe any honest
    American would even consider this!!!!!!

  • GEORGE BRADSHAW

    Let’s not do what Hitler did. This will only put guns in the hands of the criminal. Any law maker that will support taking guns away from Americans will be voted out of office. That’s not a threat, that is a promise.

  • Bob Spiers

    How can the Senate step out of it’s boundaries to ratify a treaty from foreign countries.The Senate’s jurisdiction and power lies only in the Continent of North America within the boundaries of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA.IT is time the United States removes the United Nations out of our country.It is nothing but a Trojan Horse and a detrement to our country’s security.The UN has never in it’s existence prevented any wars between nations,but has promoted the wars.How dare the UN demand anything from the United States of America and try to control it.God Bless and Keep America Safe from the enemies of our land and thawart and dismantle all previous,existing,and future efforts to harm our Nation.

  • Nam Vet Hue City 68

    It takes at 67 votes in the Senate to ratify any treaty. It will be impossible to get that unless there is a socialist coup in the legislative branch.

  • Jim

    We need to do some real house cleaning. ALL of the current congress and the pretender in chief need to be removed. We need to elect people who can read and understand plain English, who have read and understand the US constitution, and who truly understand who they work for.

  • Gene Gross

    This isn’tthe first time around for this treaty. It came up under the Kennedy Administration. It sort of took a back burner to a number of things, including the assassination of JFK and then the Vietnam War (not some police action, a WAR). However, I am not surprised that has reared its ugly head once more. Again, we have to refight the battle that we thought was won — thanks to all of those supposed gun groups that believe in compromise in order to win. You know how you win — you whoop the other guy. We must do that this time — and nothing less will do. The Senate cannot vote on this or they will face a serious loss of seats.

  • Wayne Fengya

    England, Australia, and Canada have all confiscated guns and their crime rate increased. People like Hillary think that making such a law will eliminate ALL guns. Remember how well the Prohibition worked and how well anti-drug programs have worked. Don’t these legislators have any brains at all?
    If you don’t know your history, you will have to re-live it.
    Hitler tried the same thing.

  • Sam Lauer

    The liberal movement in this country is staggering. Obama’s record should be proof enough for ANY gun owner that he wants to disarm the citizens. Odd how the Swiss have the most prolific gun ownership per capita and the lowest crime…Like Wayne said, England and Australia have strict gun bans and the crime rate goes up. A fundamental shift is occuring in this country and it is the next generation that will tip the scales in favor of liberal thinking. It is up to organizations like the NRA to slap some sense into the “people”. Idiots like Sen. Schumer make incidents like the Ft. Hood shooting a platform for more gun control and turn around to go on a hunting trip with his pals. It seems they want us to do as they say and not do as they do. God help us all.

  • Frank Whalon

    The Democrats are slowing taking away the rights of American’s.

  • Maddog 6 (Oath Keeper)

    They can have my guns when they take them from my cold dead hand!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Grampy

    It’s my opinion Hilary Clinton is a very very dangerous person. Her loyalty lies not with the United States but rather with the United Nations. Her membership with the Bilderberg Group is evidence showing her loyalty. Her past record shows she is a corrupt person. The government whether it be a nation or a world can not have absolute control over people who are armed. There is a simple fact; Register all guns, confiscate all guns, control all people! The day I see blue helmets enter these United States will be the day I take the snipers oath.

  • If this does happen it will be another CIVIL WAR

  • BlessedToBeFree

    In response to Laura Warburton’s January 13th post. You can read the US Sec of State Hillary Clinton’s own statement on the Sec of State’s gov website for documentation.

    http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/10/130573.htm

    Please make not mistake, the federal government DOES want to remove “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” from our Bill of Rights and weaken our Constitution.

    Pick up your pen and your phone, write a letter, put a stamp on it and mail it to you Senators and Representatives in DC then pick up the phone and CALL!

    Your freedom depends on it.

  • Bruce Anderson

    The city Government of We the people want leadership and people to join and to inter act then why do you remove post….are and is not freedom of press and speech to upheld by them..

    But as I heard on the news not long ago actions by the court are seeking to remove the Rights to arms of the man back in november that defended him self from a man that put a Gun to his face in a local gas station robbery..

    What good does take an Oath office if the oath will not be upheld…to defend the Bill of rights and the constitution…… See More
    In light of democrats Hillary has been working in actions of Treason direct constitutional contempt of the oath of office she has been working with the United nations an a “Small Arms Treaty so as to do away with more Self defense Gun Rights..In light of H.R. Bill 45 to make it a crime for Gun owners if their weapons are stolen an used in a crime…lets not for get the latest democrats move to help the states remove the rights of Gun permit holders to cross states lines with their Gun..These actions are Unconstitutional…Vote them out sue them out U.S. Title 42 usc section 1983 and Sanctum Mcgallium…treasonous tyrants traitors

    Indiana: The Herald-Times Online Creates Controversy for Gun Owners, Manipulates Concerned Citizens, Then Refuses On-Air Debate

    The editors of the Bloomington Herald-Times maintain their First Amendment right to publish private information on Indiana gun owners who exercise their Second Amendment rights, but they refuse to defend their position in a nationally broadcast debate on the Fox News Channel.

    Two weeks after the release of their Indiana gun permit database, Bloomington Herald-Times editors were contacted by producers at the Fox News Channel to explain their editorial decision to a national audience. Fox News intended to set up a debate between the newspaper and an Indiana resident affected by their action.

    The paper’s editors refused to come on television, deciding instead to send a written statement and allow the Brady Campaign to speak on their behalf.

    “Our purpose was to provide public information we believed people would be interested in…we have databases for property buyers and sellers, restaurants that have been inspected, public salaries and more…we don’t believe we are treating them like criminals,” Bob Zaltsberg, Herald-Times Editor.

    If the gun database does not effectually characterize gun owners as dangerous menaces to Indiana society, why does the country’s number one gun control organization defend the paper by dishonestly accusing Indiana’s “Shall Issue” Right-to-Carry system of being ineffective at preventing criminals from obtaining permits?

    Why does the Brady Campaign echo the newspaper’s earlier defense as committing a “public service” with the false assertion that “people with concealed carry permits often commit very violent crimes”?

    The Herald-Times Online has not honestly defended their position, as they falsely accused your NRA of manipulation and fear-mongering. Now they cannot withstand the public scrutiny and the Brady Campaign stepped in to take up their fight.

    Click here to view the Fox News debate between the Brady Campaign and Indiana gun blogger, Caleb Giddings:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8HJsAa79rk

    Please continue to contact the Herald-Times and ask them to take down their permit holder database. Also, please contact their advertisers as well and respectfully urge them to end any and all connections with the Herald-Times until they have taken down their blatant invasion of privacy.
    Bob Zaltsberg, Editor
    (812) 331-4364
    rzaltsberg@heraldt.com

    Cory Bollinger, Herald-Times Advertising Director
    (812) 331-4279
    cbollinger@heraldt.com

    Kirkwood Photo Lab and Portrait Studio
    515 West Kirkwood Ave
    Bloomington, IN 47404
    info@kirkwoodphoto.com
    (812) 332-4888

    Andrew Davis Menswear
    1. Covington Plaza
    6410 W. Jefferson Blvd.
    Fort Wayne, IN 46804
    260-436-4788
    chris@andrewdavismenswear.com

    2. Kirkwood on the Square Fountain Square Mall
    101 W. Kirkwood, Suite 119
    Bloomington, IN 47403
    812-323-7730
    macey@andrewdavismenswear.com

    Mohney Homes, Inc.
    2404 Industrial Park Drive
    Bloomington, IN 47401
    Phone (812) 332-5920
    Fax (812) 332-2989

    IU Credit Union
    PH: 812-855-7823
    Toll Free: 888-855-MYCU
    Email: marketing@iucu.org; memberservice@iucu.org; president@iucu.org

    IndianaBuyItNow.com
    buyitnow@hoosiertimes.com

    French Lick West Baden
    http://www.visitfrenchlickwestbaden.com/
    8291 W. Beechwood Avenue
    French Lick, Indiana 47432
    Toll free: (877) 422 – 9925
    Local: (812) 936 – 3418

    Underground Printing
    1. Bloomington Location:
    512 E. Kirkwood Ave
    Bloomington, IN 47408
    P: 812.558.0286
    F: 866.645.1686
    ugpbl@undergroundshirts.com

    2. West Lafayette Location:
    314 W. State St.
    West Lafayette, IN 47906
    P: 765.588.3851
    F: 866.645.1686
    ugpwl@undergroundshirts.com

    Yarns Unlimited
    http://www.yarnsunlimited.com/
    101 W. Kirkwood Avenue, Suite 129
    Bloomington, IN 47404
    (812) 334-2464
    yarnsunlimited@comcast.net

    Curry Auto Center
    2906 Buick Cadillac Blvd.
    Bloomington, IN 47401
    (812) 650-0657
    (800) 926-0555
    http://www.NRAILA.org Write Your Representative Write the Media Get Involved Locally Register to Vote contact NRA-ILA call 800-392-8683.

    And last but not lest
    personally I think it is time to “hammer sue” Those elected and or appointed persons of leadership of common defense for the protection of life out of office for treason constitutional contempt degradation of duty of the Oath of office for not banning “Abortion”. And as well the Supreme Court “{{The Blacks law Dictionary”"}} reads {{”judiciary direct constitution contempt”"}}…use ‘‘{{sanctum mcgallium”}}…it removes the immunity of…
    the wise words of a native American great men like great nations are only as great as the words they keep..The oath of a doctor is first doing no harm…
    Faith with out just actions is a worthless faith…sue them out vote them out

    Man is the key to the door way of heaven…and women is the gate and the lock join and let new life come forth Amen

    Bruce Anderson of reader of imprimis from hills Dale College

    This is Good, now if we the people of the United States will be smart. We will vote out the Obama nationalistic democrat anti Jewish/Hebrew views and the actions to support the Palestinians and the other Islamic a Muslim nations that have been trying to use Obama. As it is those nations kings have been trying as I understand it to buy off Obama to stop sending troops and so on to that part of the world to maintain the show of United States Support of the Jews in Israel. For as I understand it they have been seeking to use Obama to force the hand of the Jewish people to hand over more “”( water way land rights off the Jordan river)”” to those anti Jew nations the Jews gave to those nations in treaties to maintain the peace.
    {“”Quote I heard on Rush Limbaugh that those anti Jewish nations seek to make Obama king of the United States till he dies end quote””.}
    As I see it those actions by the kings of those nations are to help those anti Jewish nations show they have power over the Jewish people so they may do what ever they want “”not happen”” Jokes on them the united states stand to answer the call and has since world war two Jokes on them we have Term limits psalms 109:8 “let his days be few an another take his place of leadership” and the people are still armed “Common defense” the heart of the second amendment for the Oath of office as the leadership of Common defense national defense starts will self defense for the protection of life “Not Abortion” as I understand it we the people got our Bill of Rights Amendment number Two the rights to arms A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed”” we get from the Bible by those that believed in the wisdom of the word of God In Yeshua’s name the book of Esther Chapter 8:11 the “kings edict gave the Jews in each city the right assemble and defend them selves. “ The right to Arms Keeping Tyrants at bay for 200 years and counting…personally I think it is time to “hammer sue” Those elected persons of leadership of common defense for the protection of life out of office for treason constitutional contempt degradation of duty of the Oath of office for not banning “Abortion”.
    May the Blessings of the uncreated one in Yeshua’s name be over Israel may Israel become what it was meant to be…So mote it is?
    Bruce Anderson on face Book

  • Folks, If you give them ,(The politicians) your guns, then you are a weak bunch. Where is the “Courage” , that built this country.. I have courage to fight to the death, do you. .Swampdog Gainesville Florida

  • If the U.N. is gonna start over-riding OUR CONSTITUTION, maybe it’s time to START USING THESE GUNS!!!
    Aj

  • Ron Hammelman

    I agree, you have to contact your Senators because it takes 67 to ratify any treaty. The easiest way I found is to go to their website, they all have one, put your message in the contact section and fire away. Most use their last name.senate.gov but you can google and find it. I usually copy text from alerts like above and paste in the comment section. I bug mine almost weekly about stuff I want them to pay attention to. They read them because I have gotten responses. Don’t let them mess with our 2nd Amendment rights. Amen.

  • Stephen

    I’m with Laura Warburton. I’m a freedom loving second amendment supporter, but this report seems overblown for the purpose of raising funds. When I got the NGR email, I did a google search and read several articles including the 2006 UN report. The most rational report I read was from Fact Check. Here is Fact Check’s explanation:
    http://m.factcheck.org/2009/12/international-gun-ban-treaty/
    They raise the question I have, how would ratification of a foreign treaty somehow negate a freedom guaranteed by our Constitution? I have no doubt that Hillary and Obama would love to strike down the second amendment, but I think the threat behind the UN Small Arms Treaty is to those who manufacture and ship arms. I think these questions deserve a clarification here on your blog, not just a quick comment.

  • If ANY senator wants to keep his seat, this crap (A violation of the 2nd Amendment) will go down in flames!

  • Edith R Purkiss

    The possibility that any of our current administration would even consider this, is a gross disregard for the constitution. In my opinion, when legislation is presented which directly violates constitutional dogma, it is a reflection of the mind and will of anyone who presents or supports them. Perhaps anyone wishing to obtain political office (and prior to any election by the people) should be required to complete a constitution questionnaire and publish the answers on all political advertisements or pamphlets so citizens will know who they’re getting. But I digress. Removing the guns from the hands of law abiding citizens, will only ensure that criminals have guns and then our liberties will be gone! (PS. If passed, then the secret service can’t have guns either!)

  • Lee T.

    This November, vote all the Bastards OUT!!! Every last one of them! Never vote for an Incumbent Politician again.

  • I think this is a piggyback of the 1997 Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and other Related Materials which was endorsed by the Organization of American States (OAS) in Latin American. Of course, countries like Venezuela did not ratify it and with good reason; though Chavez does not need to worry about signing any treaties to slow or regulate the number of weapons coming into the country and across borders. He just does what he wants.

    One point of contention with these treaties is predictably the involvement of foreign powers in the business of national security and the rule of law in the U.S. If it’s not by way of the ICC or some other international judicial body, our gun rights will at some point be eradicated. These treaties mean to curb how countries modernize and build their military capability but fails to actually protect the people in those countries from violence due to crime or armed conflicts between bordering states.

    On a different note, the U.S. signed the Convention but did not ratify it, but we’re not like Venezuela naturally. My problem is that we left the door open for other states, hostile and friendly alike, to stick the proverbial hand in the cookie jar. While other countries build up we’re downsizing, and that includes ‘a well-armed militia.’

    Disturbing news indeed.

  • gm

    I don’t trust Hillary, Obama, Holder and certainly not the UN, but do you have any evidence, any at all?

  • I believe the time has come for all true Anericans to stand and be counted whether you are a gun owner or not.
    If these tyrants in Washington can legislate the Second Amendmendment out of our Constitution, Then what else are they capable of.
    Remember the writing on the wall at Auschwitz “First they came for the jews, then the Poles then they came for me.”

  • Don

    This is treason – pure and simple. And make no mistake about this agenda. The globalist anti-gun people and the gun-grabbers are going to pull out ALL of their stops to ram this criminality thru.

    They will use the UN to circumvent the American people, our Congress, and the Constitution.

    Besides fighting this agenda with everything we’ve got, we must awaken all American active duty military and law enforcement to this treason, as they will be the ones who in part will be called upon to enforce this tyranny and slavery upon the American people.

    For more on this awakening, read this outstanding op/ed at http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2010/01/dear-officer.html — and if you are active or former military (as I am) or law enforcement be sure to both join and recommend Oath Keepers.

    For liberty! http://DonUSA.blogspot.com

  • elizabeth perkins

    the one who takes our guns will take our lives.

  • James Fuller

    What is this world coming to. after Obama’s speech they all
    need impeached. starting with OBAMA. they will have a hard time
    getting my guns Also these senators that vote for it needs to
    be taken behind the barn

  • MICHAEL HARMER

    The Democrats are slowing taking away the rights of American’s. HAVING SAID THAT THOUGH it appears that the government is creating its own rules as they go along – Look at all the Kazes the current President has named. The only way around this is to vote out the current government as it stands today.

  • Chris

    This is total HORSESH*T!!!!!! Who the hell does Clinton think she is, who do the people of the current administration think they are to go to this assinine meet and greet by the UN to grossly and clearly VIOLATE out soveriegnty and our God given rights? Who does the U.N. think it is to take it upon themselves to determine who is free and who is not. All I know is this U.S. Marine Corps Infantry Rifleman says prepare to lock and load.

  • R. U. PayingAttention

    I can NOT believe some of the comments that state ” it is against our constitution” or, “it would be treason” or, “it would take a socialist coup”!!!! The U.N. doesn’t give one hoot about our Constitution. Are you watching the news, adding 2+2, thinking for yourself at all. The coup has already happened inside. They are willing to sell out our rights in the blink of an eye. Also the Senate has suspended the rules so it NO LONGER takes 67 votes to pass anything. Pay attention. Your COUNTRY is at stake, along with YOUR freedoms!!!

  • Larry Kirk

    As Mr. Heston said “”From my cold dead hands”"
    Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.

  • Scott Anderson

    There is much more to this than poor decision making by the democrats. It is a global takeover by the financial institutions. Jefferson warned us of this, and the time is at hand for us to stand together again!

  • E

    So where exactly in this treaty does it mention confiscation of arms? There isn’t any new draft so everyone is in an uproar for something that no one has even read yet. WTF?

  • Pass the ammo, come get em.

  • Steve Inmaine

    The President may sign a Treaty but it must also be ratified by 66 senators. Considering the Big O could not get 60 votes for Healthcare, I doubt that he could get 66 votes for this treaty in question.

    Also, even if it did get ratified, it would be a clear violation of the 2nd as quantified by Heller. I really think we have nothing to worry about this.

    But what if it was ratified and then deemed not a violation of the 2nd, the political landscape concerning gun control has changed since the O was elected. Five years ago gun control was consdered, by the majority of pro-gun folks, as idiotic crime control policy and a violation of the 2nd. Today, it would be considered THE first step towards TYRANNY and a violation of the 2nd.

    The response to such a treaty becoming law would be far more “intense” and much more “fierce” than the reaction Americans have had to sociallized medicine.

    Article 2 Section 2

    “He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur…”

    Article 6

    “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding

  • Ed Vaughn

    Everyone knows why our private ownership of arms by some a necessary imperative of the greedy. The polititians of our forefathers knew all to well why arms ownership needed to be included and a necessary Admentment in our constitution. It had been demonstrated many many times how certain persons, groups and political leaders had wanted to have control over others their lives and the confiscation and removal of arms. This was the most highly selected way for them to have control over all of us called “We The People”. If you don’t believe what a few controling people can do look to your past history and current economy and our involvement in so very many lives of people around the world. Let confiscation happen and we will never see the ends of their demands.

  • RTF

    I am absolutely in favor of having private citizen’s keep the right to bear arms, but am concerned that some people want to push an agenda against the current administration. I have read that Obama has never suggested we lose the rights granted by the second amendment and so far I have not seen anything to suggest otherwise. The text below comes directly from the 2006 UN resolution.

    Let me also note that this Review Conference is not negotiating a “global gun ban”, nor do we wish to deny law-abiding citizens their right to bear arms in accordance with their national laws.

    Mr. President, with your permission, I would want to repeat, because there are people around who either have not heard this, or do not want to hear. We are not negotiating a global ban, nor do we wish to deny law-abiding citizens their right to bear arms in accordance with their national laws.

    Our energy, our emphasis and our anger is directed against illegal weapons, not legal ones. Our priorities are effective enforcement, better controls and regulation, safer stockpiling, and weapons collection and destruction. Our targets remain unscrupulous arms brokers, corrupt officials, drug trafficking syndicates, criminals and others who bring death and mayhem to our communities, and who ruin lives and destroy, in minutes, the labour of years. To halt the destructive march of armed conflict and crime, we must stop such purveyors of death.

  • Ken

    If this every passes we will no longer the United States of American but a country under the UN control. It will a cold day in hell before someone ever get my gun. They can have my gun when I run out of ammo or I’m dead.

  • Lewsis Staples

    Both the current (rewritten) UN treaty mentioned in this article, AND the American States Treaty on arms mentioned above, are very real, and the subject of continuing attemps by those in power in the US government to disarm us. You fail to understand that the Senate is the only body authorised to retify any international treaty, by a two-thirds vote (67 votes), AND that, once ratified, that treaty with all its provisions SUPERCEDES any US law already in effect. Read your Constitution.

    Didn’t we just see sixty six votes in the senate in favour of a “health care” bill seventy percent of Americans DO NOT WANT? Don’t sit there and glibly say they’ll never get 67 votes” on either or these treaties. If one isn’t ratified, the other won yeat may be. These perverts are serious about disarming us. They know they can’t carry both houses with gun control legislation, but if they can sneak these treaties (or even one of them) past 67 Senators, we’ve had it. The ONLY thing we could do then would be to vote those clowns out (generally a great idea anyway) and get a NEW Senate to de-ratify it, thus effectively nullifying its effect on us. If either one does get ratified, though, our right to arms as guaranteed in the Second AMmendment would be gone, subjugated to foreign powers. Certainly an abdication of our sovereignty as a nation. And, I should think, more than adequate grounds for the impeachment of all who promoted it.

    But, as we saw with our present Secretary of State’s husband, GROUNDS for impeachment and IMPEACHMENT are two very different things.

    Write your senators, keep writing them. Check their voting records and if they’re not pro gun, work to send them to the unemployment lines next November. Washington State will have a chance to give Patty Murray, a redical antigun sort, the toss then. I hope we wake up and figure it out. Cantwell doesn’t stand for reelection until 2012, and the day those two no longer “represent” me will be a better one than I’ve seen for some time. Check your own senators, see how they’ve voted on Bill of Rights issues, and replace any that don’t pass muster.

  • old jim hardy

    Re Laura Warburton’s post about the reply she received:

    did you see this note at bottom of that page?

    “For information media • not an official record”

  • James

    I’ll do my voting with my Glock, my Ruger and my Kimber. The first Fed that comes to my door to unConstitutionally and illegally confiscate my firearms gets a face full of lead. LIVE FREE OR DIE!

  • IraqVet

    Over whose dead body????

  • C. Cope

    Did anyone of you stop to think that “67″ Senators adopt unconstitutional laws every time they are in session? Do not think it is impossible that they will sign this treaty. And really, some of you need to crack open your never read constitution and read up on the treaty powers.

    Nevertheless, treaties do NOT make the constitution null and void as the constitution IS the Supreme Law of the land.

    And by the way, remember this:

    You all voted for the dumbocrats all these years … and here we are.

    You all voted for the repukocrats all these years … and here we are.

    Obama just didn’t appear out of some primordial goo and you suddenly lost your freedoms. The loss of your freedoms and your republic has many faces and many names.

  • Lesser countries have suffered human rights abuses under the fascists dictatorships imposed by the good ole USA. The USA has been doing this kind of thing to the third world for years now. Most of you people on this site have turned a blind eye to these atrocities. You have also turned a blind eye to the corruption of the politicians you have supported. Your indifference has created a system of dictatorship that is now going to be imposed upon you. Karma is a bitch isn’t it? All of you talk big talk about the Constitution and yet you continue to support the Demo or Repub parties that have been destroying our Constitution for years now. If there is anyone to blame for our demise one has only to look at the idiot in the mirror who votes for the Demo/Repub machine of dictatorship. VOTE INDEPENDENT, or you will continue supporting the agents of the UN.

  • Here’s what an infamous historical figure had to say about the individual ownership of guns:

    “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms …” – Adolph Hitler

    Love Liberty not Leaders,
    http://www.iocca.us

  • LOL AMERICANS

    R. U. PayingAttention is right. You americans are hilarious. “im a freedom loving american lol!” Give me a break. Your country is responsible for the deaths of millions of innocent poeple with its non-stop wars. Your country spies on its own citizens illegally, it tortures people overseas, supports a war criminal rogue state in the middle east, supports puppet dictators all over the world…i could go on and on, but the main point is that YOUR COUNTRY HATES YOU. 9/11 First Responders are left to die with a variety of illnesses caused by the deadly WTC dust, there will never EVER be another 9/11 investigation, Hurricaine Katrina victims left at the mercy of Mother Nature and Blackwater military contractors, your hard-earned tax dollars are given to banks by the BILLIONS for FREE and you will get NOTHING in return, and the NATIONAL DEBT your CHILDREN and your CHILDREN’S CHILDREN will have to pay has reached OVER 12 TRILLION DOLLARS. Americans, your country hates you to death, you are nothing but a cash cow and a soldier to be thrown into a meat grinder somewhere overseas. REAL AMERICANS would say NO MORE, take up arms and REVOLT. You know, real Americans like the Founding Fathers.

    WAKE UP AMERICA!

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>