U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban
The United Nations and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are moving forward with their plan to confiscate your guns.
The United States joined 152 other countries in support of the Arms Trade Treaty Resolution, which establishes the dates for the 2012 UN conference intended to attack American sovereignty by stripping Americans of the right to keep and bear arms.
Working groups of anti-gun countries will begin scripting language for the conference this year, creating a blueprint for other countries when they meet at the full conference.
The stakes couldn’t be higher.
Former United Nation’s ambassador John Bolton has cautioned gun owners about the Arms Trade Treaty and says the UN “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there’s no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”
Establishing the dates for the Arms Trade Treaty Conference is just the first step toward their plans for total gun confiscation.
The worldwide gun control mob will ensure the passage of an egregious, anti-gun treaty…
. . .and that’s where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton steps in.
Once the UN Gun Ban is passed by the General Assembly of the United Nations it must be ratified by each nation, including the United States.
As an arch enemy of gun owners, Clinton has pledged to push the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty. She will push for passage of this outrageous treaty designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.
That’s why it’s vital you sign the special petition I’ve made up for your signature that DEMANDS your U.S. Senators vote AGAINST ratification of the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty.”
So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.
But looking at previous versions of the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.
Don’t let any of the “experts” lull you to sleep by saying “Oh, we have it handled” or “Until you know exactly what’s in the treaty you can’t fight against it.”
Judging by Ambassador Bolton’s comments — who certainly knows what to expect from the American-freedom-hating international crowd that infests the U.N. — we are certain the treaty’s going to address the private ownership of firearms.
If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate (which is where we must ultimately make our stand), the UN “Small Arms Treaty” would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:
*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;
*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);
*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;
*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION. So please click here to sign the petition to your U.S. Senators before it’s too late!
You see, this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.
Here’s what you can do to help the National Association for Gun Rights fight Hillary Clinton and her United Nations cronies:
• Forward this petition to your friends and relatives who share your concern for American sovereignty and protecting our right to keep and bear arms.
• Please consider making a generous contribution to the National Association for Gun Rights to help us fight Hillary Clinton and the United Nations “Small Arms Treaty.”
good way to start WWIII
This is just the start, just as Hitler did (Gun registration, then confiscation. in 1938). Our 1968 gun laws are modeled after Hitler’s laws.
In the Global scheme, it is about total control. The U.N. has as already stated that they will never let a country get as powerful as the U.S., the U.N. along with Obamam’s plans to put this Country in such a deficit that we can never recover will make us Compliant to the U.N. and the world banks (IMF).
This is just the first step. Stay armed not only with firearms to protect your family and your self, stay armed with knowledge
This “call to action” lacks citations and links to independent reporting articles. Foolish people get whipped up by unsupported claims. Just as dangerous as government abridgment of freedom are fear-mongering and unsupported claims designed to get an uninformed public to do one’s bidding. Where are your facts to convince me to believe your premise?
Not sure where Ms. Buchanan is getting her version of the constitution from. The second amendment says nothing about the event of an attack is when the people have the right to bear arms. This is what it says exactly “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. I don’t think that is open for interpretation!
[...] The 2nd Amendment has been the crucial amendment that is there to guard against tyranny. U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban YouTube – Myth: Gun Control Reduces Crime Once our Bill of Rights is attacked with the treaty any [...]
[...] source [...]
The important point was a broad one, Justice Alito wrote: that the Second Amendment, like other provisions of the Bill of Rights guaranteeing fundamental rights, must be applied to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. They said the Heller decision remained incorrect, and added that they would not have extended its protections to state and local laws even if it had been correctly decided.
“Although the court’s decision in this case might be seen as a mere adjunct to Heller,” Justice Stevens wrote, “the consequences could prove far more destructive — quite literally — to out nation’s communities and to our constitution.”
Though the majority agreed on the outcome, its members differed about how to get there.
The Second Amendment, like the rest of the Bill of Rights, originally restricted only the power of the federal government. The Supreme Court later ruled that most, but not all, of the protections of the Bill of Rights applied to the power of the states as well, under the due-process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, adopted in the wake of the Civil War.
The majority offered the lower courts little guidance about how much protection the Second Amendment affords. In a part of his opinion that Justice Thomas declined to join, Justice Alito reiterated the caveats in the Heller decision, saying the court did not mean to cast doubt on laws prohibiting possession of guns by felons and people who suffer from mental illness, laws forbidding carrying guns in sensitive places like schools and government buildings or laws regulating the commercial sale of firearms.
The important point was a broad one, Justice Alito wrote: that the Second Amendment, like other provisions of the Bill of Rights guaranteeing fundamental rights, must be applied to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. They said the Heller decision remained incorrect, and added that they would not have extended its protections to state and local laws even if it had been correctly decided.
Hillary,
Not much poin for all to corrupt the Constitution. Particularly in conjunction with you and a corrupt UN.
We’ll keep the 2nd Amendment just the way it is along with the Constitution. Back in 1787 they had a significently greater vision than you and your colleagues have today
You can do all the editing you want but…..
DON’T TREAD ON ME!
We will protect what we have!
What’s your plans after the next election?
Good Luck,
Sheldon
Hillary,
“Things are just fine(except in Government).
However, that faux pas will be fixed sooner than later.
Thank you Hillary,
PS what are you doing after the election?
They say the weather is delightful in Carcaus this time of the year. Perhaps Hugo will buy you a taco or two.
Don’t forget that that our Second Amendment is found in what is called the Bill of Rights. This means that this right cannot be appealed or dissolved. It is a right that is inherently given to us by our creator God, (or a Natural right for those that do not believe in a god) and is fundamental in ensuring that that which is most dear is protected: Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
I think it’s comical to see that our Four Fathers knew what trash would come into power. They knew the future and what would come.
“God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion.
The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is
wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts
they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions,
it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. …
And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not
warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of
resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as
to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost
in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from
time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
It is its natural manure.”
–Thomas Jefferson
You are right, this could start WWIII
They’ll only get mine when they pry them from my cold, de3ad, fingertips.
[...] UN Gun Ban? I hope this is in the right place and is not redundant. It seems almost all of what goes on in this country against decent people is hidden from them uintil it is sprung upon them en masse. Scary for sure IMO. NAGR Gun Rights Blog U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban [...]
They better start building alot of jails
And cemetaries. IT WILL PUT TRUE AMERICANS AT WAR.
Welcome to the Unitrd States of UN. Now they can overide the US constitution.
Welcome to the Unitrd States of UN. Now they can overide the US constitution.
They better start building alot of jails
They want my guns,they’ll get them business end first!!!I don’t care who it is!Our Second Amendment is in place to help us keep our government from doing this and over stepping their bounderies.It allows us to completely overthrow their worthless hides,by force of arms if need be.It’s time to change our government and get these pond scum out of office.IT’S TIME TO TAKE A STAND ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!They had a stroke when Arizona tried passisng their immigration law,and started screaming it was unconstitutional,yet here they are trying to deconstruct a portion of our Costitution in order to fit in with his\her personal agenda.These dodo’s in power need to get a clue and give it up.Obama and his lackeys need to get a life and leave America alone,then maybe we can get back on track and work on the real issues when their gone!!!!
I will fight to the death before they take my guns. The government has seem to be forgeting for the people by the people. We has a nation banning together with one voice can say no. If the government does not hear us then we has united states of america will have to over turn the the ones takeing our rights away. Did they defend us from 911 no the bastards let it happen. Did they do anything for us except spend all our money no. I am not looking for the government to protect me. I will protect me. There was a old man last week got his home broke into. He had a gun and had to shoot one of the thugs in his house as they were trying to charge him. It saved his life. It was a hand gun. Clinton safer in the high livin areas you live in. If you dont like our gun laws then leave the Us go to some where to some other country to take there guns away. We dont want it dont need it lady liberty has had to many people like this to try and take her from us and till death do us part GOD BLESS AMERICA MY HOME SWEET HOME
be prepared vote this lberals out before the second civilwar begans. these librels are a direct threat to freedom loving americans. i will die protecting my right to bear arms
Glad there are still some red blooded AMERICANS left in country!
[...] [...]
This concerns the UN proposed gun ban treaty.
The federal gov’t is operating under the foreign commerce clause when working with the United Nations. How can this matter to Americans? Here’s how we got into this situation.
The Declaration of Independence is the organic law of the land and its main tenet is that “all men are created equal”. Under such a tenet no person or group of people, including some group called government, may ever initiate force or fraud against any other person or group of people. The Constitution was adopted to form a gov’t that would uphold this tenet.
The Constitution acknowledges this where in Article I, section 8 it grants the federal government jurisdiction over foreign commerce, interstate commerce, and trade with the Indians. The federal government has no jurisdiction over intrastate commerce since the law is based upon the tenet that “all men are created equal”. The individual American is sovereign, not the federal gov’t. See the following Supreme Court decisions that uphold the sovereignty of the individual – United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, Hale v. Henkle, 201 U.S. 43, Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421, Chisholm v. Georgia, 1 L.Ed. (2 Dall.) 415. All of these Supreme Court decisions were rendered before the bankruptcy of the federal gov’t in the 1930’s. Cites from each of these cases can be found at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3g on my Blog.
The FED bankrupted the gov’t in the 1930′s. This is easily evidenced by the correlation between the United States Code (USC) and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): title 11 USC, “Bankruptcy”, is implemented by title 11 CFR, “Federal Elections”. Our vote is simply to elect a bankruptcy “administration”.
However, bankrupting the federal gov’t wasn’t enough to make Americans pay the interest on the FED’s counterfeit money loans to the gov’t. Sovereignty lies with the individual American, not the federal gov’t. as evidenced above by the Supreme Court.
To get around all of the chains that the Constitution imposes on the federal gov’t, Social Security was created to destroy American sovereignty. The “Form SS-5″ that an applicant uses to apply for a S.S.# is actually a federal employment form. After all, only a federal employee is liable for federal employment taxes. You know the name of the federal employee – the “taxpayer”. “Taxpayer” is a legal term defined at 26 CFR 2.1-1(a)(5) as a member of the Merchant Marine – a federal employee. 26 CFR 2.1-1(b) states that this is the definition of the term as used throughout the Code and the regulations for all calculation of taxes.
The gov’t has been given jurisdiction over its possessions by Article IV, section 3 of the Constitution. By checking the box “U.S. citizen” on the “Form SS-5″ the applicant has given the gov’t prima facie evidence that he has U.S. possession citizenship. “U.S. citizen” is also a legal term exemplified at 26 CFR 25.2501-1(c) as a person born in one of the States who then establishes a residence in a U.S. possession (Puerto Rico is cited in the example) and, further, acquires U.S. possession citizenship. This regulation then references back to 26 USC sec. 2501(b) where it states that this is the definition of the term “citizen” “wherever used in the title”. The U.S. possessions are treated as foreign countries (see 26 USC sec. 865(i)(3), 872(b)(7), and 2014(g) for example). This makes a “U.S. citizen” a foreigner in relation to America. This is the 14th Amendment citizen.
The combination of the legal terms “taxpayer” and “U.S. citizen” is known as the “U.S. resident” at 26 USC sec. 865(g). A “U.S. resident” is a “U.S citizen” living in America – a foreigner.
So by applying for a S.S.# an American has given away all sovereignty and become a slave to the federal gov’t.
All of this evidences that the owners of the gov’t are quite aware of its limited jurisdiction, but they have absolutely no regard for freedom.
The federal gov’t is legislating today on two main premises – under foreign commerce and that everyone is a federal employee.
The CFR was created during the bankruptcy proceedings in the mid-1930’s to evidence the correlation of which of the new federal regulatory agencies would be in charge of implementing the regulations under the statutes of the USC.
Obviously, federal gov’t regulatory agencies can have no jurisdiction over a sovereign American since “all men are created equal” and the federal gov’t has no jurisdiction over intrastate commerce. A sovereign American cannot be denied any rights. But a “U.S. resident” has no constitutional protections.
Since one becomes a “taxpayer” by applying for a S.S.#, that person is now subject to the income tax.
The income tax was ruled to be constitutional in several U.S. Supreme Court decisions – see Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), Stanton v. Baltic Mining, 240 US 103 (1916), Peck & Co. v. Lowe, 247 US 165 (1918), Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920). These Supreme Court decisions all stated that the gov’t always had the power to tax income and, further, that no new power of taxation was granted to the federal gov’t by the 16th Amendment. In other words, the income being taxed must be within the limited jurisdiction of the federal gov’t to begin with since no new power was granted to the federal gov’t. Cites from each of these cases can be found at http://wp.me/pCW6e-3a on my Blog.
Internal revenue is within the customs. Customs gains revenue for the gov’t from importing duties from foreign countries. Internal revenue gains revenue for the gov’t from importing duties from the U.S. possessions – thus a source of “internal revenue”. Customs is foreign commerce.
The 3 commerce jurisdictions are cited separately in title 28 USC, “Judiciary and Judicial Procedure”, chapter 85, “District Courts; Jurisdiction”. Section 1336, “Surface Board Transportation Orders”, which was renamed from “Interstate Commerce Commission’s Orders” in late 1995, is the interstate commerce jurisdiction. Section 1362, “Indian Tribes”, is obviously the trade with the Indians commerce jurisdiction. Section 1340, “Internal revenue; customs duties”, is the foreign commerce jurisdiction. Income tax is the second plank of the Communist Manifesto. Inheritance tax is the third plank of the Communist Manifesto. These communistic taxes are only available to the federal gov’t under foreign commerce along with the presumption that the individual is a federal employee.
Social Security is the basis of all of America’s problems. A sovereign American is just that – sovereign, not subject to any other person. But a “U.S. resident” is subject to every federal regulatory agency in the United States as a foreigner, including the Socialistic United Nations. No treaty with the UN or any other country can impact an American’s sovereignty or an American’s rights.
Go to LLSTULER.wordpress.com to see the entire Social Security Scam.