Mayor opposed to guns and civil rights

Cedric Glover, Mayor of Shreveport Lousiana believes he and his jackbooted thugs state police have the authority to wantonly violate your civil rights.

Mayor Glover believes that his brownshits state police have authority to “suspend” your rights.

From the blog Pro Libertate:

Any time a motorist is stopped by a police officer, insists Shreveport, Louisiana Mayor Cedric Glover, “Your rights … have been suspended.” This includes not only the freedom of movement, but also, in the event the officer inquires as to whether the driver is carrying a weapon, “Your right to be able to hold on to your weapon and say whether [you] have a weapon or not” — as well as the right to retain possession of that weapon, should the officer decide to confiscate it from you.

Should you choose not to answer the question, or answer it in the negative, the officer could still choose, “in the interest of officer safety, to secure you in a safe position” — this most likely means outside the car with your hands cuffed behind your back — “and then do an appropriate inspection of your vehicle.”

The phrase “appropriate inspection” is more honestly rendered “Unconstitutional” warrantless search.”

Should the police officer then turn up a firearm or other weapon in the car, the driver “would be guilty or potentially guilty of even a more severe offense” than whatever he had allegedly done to precipitate the traffic stop, according to Mayor Glover. Police officers, according to Glover, are invested with “a power that the President of the United States does not have … and that is the ability to be able to suspend your rights.”

This is “one of the things that I say to each and every one of the police officers who graduates from the Shreveport Police Academy since I’ve been mayor.” Fortunately for the public, one supposes, Mr. Glover remembers the lesson that Peter Parker learned from his kindly and sagacious uncle Ben — that is, with great power comes great responsibility.”You have to understand there is a great deal of power that is vested within … the law enforcement personnel of this country,” Glover insists. “It’s why there is a great deal of responsibility that has to go along with it.”

Glover offered those remarkable observations, and many others like them, in a recorded phone call with Shreveport resident Robert Baillio

Mr. Baillio had called to complain about a recent traffic stop in which an SPD officer, who– before dealing with any other matter of business — asked if Baillio had a firearm, then temporarily seized it from him.

Louisiana law recognizes the right of the state’s residents to carry loaded weapons in their vehicles, and Baillio has a state-issued concealed carry permit — that is, a piece of paper in which the state generously recognizes one facet of Baillio’s innate right to bear arms.

According to Baillio’s account, he was cordial and polite when he was stopped after supposedly neglecting to use a turn signal. That this was almost certainly a pretext stop is illustrated by the fact that Baillio never received a ticket. Supplemental evidence is offered by the fact that the conversation between the officer and Baillio focused entirely on the issue of gun ownership, including a question about Baillio’s membership in the National Rifle Association.

Glover is a member of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Agaisnt Illegal Guns, however it looks like Glover is opposed to all guns.

You hear the entire audio of Mr. Baillio’s conversation with Mayor Glover here.

852 comments to Mayor opposed to guns and civil rights

  • moving target

    Let me ask you this, is Mayor Glover black, and is the SPD officer black, and is Robert Baillio white? Maybe this is more of a racial profiling situation. I know nobody wants to say it because if you do you will be called a racist, but I don’t care. The fact is I have noticed a difference since Obummer has been elected potus. This isn’t about guns only, it’s about power, it’s about WHO RULES. It seems that the people in this country are becoming obsessed with trying to tell each other what to do. The NRA needs to sue both Glover and the SPD officer, and we need to demand their resignation!!!

  • Constitutional rights are only surrendered when one is lawfully being apprehended for a dangerous crime. Operating within the law never gives an official the right to remove or suspend out rights.

    After reading this account of illegal search and seizure, I will think twice before surrendering my weapon to an official. The point at which an armed official over steps his or her bounds is where I or my family or those around me are in personal danger of bodily harm from said official and need my protection. An official who grossly oversteps their bounds is no longer duly appointed by the state.

    When law abiding citizens become criminals by caveat, a citizen’s revolt is not far behind.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>